As singles meet and match online, cyberdaters all begin with the
same problem: initially at least, they know nothing about their virtual
partners. In the real world, couples are usually introduced through
mutual friends or family members who are then grilled for personal
history and references. In the online world, that knowledge has to be
gathered directly from the potential date - and those
getting-to-know-you e-mails usually form the first phase of most
cyber-relationships.
Occasionally however, suspicions are aroused. Lawyers who claim to be
in their thirties let slip that they have 20 years' experience.
Apparently perfect partners refuse to reveal personal details and say
the relationship has to be kept quiet. Attractive women start sounding
remarkably like men. Usually, those suspicions are enough to send the
relationship straight to the recycle bin, but increasingly, thousands
of users are choosing to have their doubts confirmed first with the
help of a professional background check.
Linda Alexander is the owner of whoisshe.com and whoishe.com, Internet
services that offer personal checks on online lovers. In the three and
a half years she has been running the websites, the San Diego attorney
says she has checked the identities and records of "thousands" of
virtual love-seekers. In fact, she says, in some 60 percent of the
cases, her clients' suspicions are proved correct. Marital status and
age are among the most popular areas for untruths, and men and women,
it seems, are equally prone to exaggeration.
"We find men who say they're 48 years old and they turn out to be 71
and women who say they're 33 years old and turn out to be 47," says
Alexander. "It's all over the place."
For $39, Alexander's firm will carry out a basic background check,
searching public records to reveal a person's name, date of birth and
address history. For $75, the search will also include professional
licenses, aliases, bankruptcies and liens, while an additional $45 will
reveal details of the subject's criminal record, if one exists.
Citing some of the worst examples, Alexander explains how her firm
discovered that a woman with children was dating a registered
pedophile, that one client's partner had been arrested for firing a gun
into a house, while another was communicating with a woman who was
actually serving time in jail for manslaughter.
In each of the cases, the client was aware that something was wrong and
wanted their fears confirmed before giving their partners the final
push. "In most cases, they're already 'in love'," she explains.
"They're just not going to break up until something smacks them in the
face and says something's not okay."
In fact, the clients of background services are often not the
cyber-daters themselves, but members of their families concerned about
their loved ones' welfare. With many senior citizens using the Internet
to look for a late love, worried children often ask companies like
Alexander's to vet their parents' potential partners. According to
Arthur Faram, President of CheckMate, up to a quarter of his clients
are the families of online lovers.
For Linda Alexander however, the stories that her investigators turn up
also ring a personal note. She started her business in November 1997
after meeting a man in a chatroom who claimed to be a widowed doctor.
When a quick check failed to find a death certificate for the man's
wife, she became suspicious.
"I asked several times what was going on and he always had an excuse.
When I ran a background check, I found that the wife was alive and well
and still living at home," she explained.
While Alexander broke off the relationship and chalked one up to
experience, Carmen Lynn, President of DateSmart.com, was less lucky. In
1989, she was working for a private investigator, carrying out
surveillance work in dark alleys and talking to clients caught in bad
relationships. "At the time. I thought, 'How could someone ever get
themselves in a situation like this? They must know better, have better
judgment, should be able to make reasonable decisions.' Then I met
someone, knew him for five weeks and married him five months later."
Lynn's husband turned out to be a con artist who defrauded her of
$25,000. Their marriage was annulled after just three months. Six years
later, recognizing a need for cyber-daters to date safely, she set up
DateSmart.com to allow Internet users to carry out background checks on
their online partners.
Like Whoishe.com, DateSmart.com also trawls public records to reveal a
potential partner's past history, but rather than offering a complete
package of checks, DateSmart.com gears searches to investigate the
client's specific suspicions. "DateSmart is more like going to the
doctor and saying 'it hurts here'," says Lynn.
Her 80 percent success rate has included a man who dressed up as a
woman to fool an entire chatroom as well as the usual collection of
wives whose deaths were greatly exaggerated.
According to Lynn, the motives for deception are often difficult to
determine but can range from monetary gain to simple kicks. Although
there are a number of warning signs that can suggest something isn't
quite right about a relationship, the best advice is to trust your
instincts: if something feels wrong, it probably is.
While the rates at which background services reveal dishonesty may seem
remarkably high, the bad relationships aren't necessarily indicative of
cyber-dating as a whole. Arthur Faram only reported a 5 percent turn-up
rate, while Linda Alexander points out that background services are
usually the last stop for cyber-daters who are already suspicious, but
aren't quite ready to split.
"I have to think that many of the times that people contact us, they
already have a sense that something isn't right," she explains. "You
just have to use the same kind of common sense you would if you met
someone in a bar."
As she points out though, love often leaves little room for common sense.
|